I remember something from my childhood in Sweden that tells the entire story of what we've lost.
Coming back from school holidays, kids in my class would have casts on their arms, on their legs. Battle scars from summer adventures—climbing trees, building forts, exploring forests, taking the kinds of risks that make childhood memorable.
Today, you walk into a Year 3 classroom and nobody has casts. Not because kids have become more careful, but because they never leave the house. They spend entire summers playing Roblox and staring at iPads instead of exploring the world.
As a futurist who loves technology, I never thought I'd be arguing for less screen time. But here we are...
Here's what's happening: today's parents are engaging in a dangerous form of helicopter parenting where they're overprotecting their kids in the physical world while underprotecting them in the virtual world.
We've become terrified of scraped knees and broken bones—injuries that heal in weeks—while we hand our children devices that expose them to cyberbullying, anxiety disorders, depression, and addictive algorithms designed by teams of neuroscientists to capture developing minds.
We're protecting them from temporary physical harm while exposing them to permanent psychological damage.
The irony is staggering. We won't let our 10-year-old walk to the corner store alone, but we'll give them unrestricted access to platforms where predators, extremists, and billion-dollar companies compete for their attention.
Jonathan Haidt's groundbreaking research in "The Anxious Generation" reveals the devastating cost of this trade-off. Since 2010—coinciding with the rise of smartphones and social media—rates of anxiety, depression, and self-harm among teens have skyrocketed.
The data is unambiguous:
Meanwhile, developmental psychology research consistently shows that free-range play—unsupervised, unstructured, sometimes risky outdoor exploration—is absolutely critical for healthy child development.
Studies demonstrate that children who engage in outdoor play develop:
We're not just changing how kids spend their time. We're changing how their brains develop.
The tide is finally turning. Australia is leading the charge with proposed legislation to ban social media for children under 16. Similar movements are gaining momentum across Europe and North America.
But legislation is only part of the solution. The real change needs to happen in our homes, our schools, and our communities. We need to rediscover what childhood is supposed to look like.
This isn't about being anti-technology. It's about being pro-child development.
This feels strange to write as someone who's spent two decades helping organizations navigate digital transformation. I've consulted with tech companies, spoken at innovation conferences, and built my career on understanding how technology shapes our future.
But watching what's happening to children has forced me to confront an uncomfortable truth: not all technological progress is human progress.
Some of our most sophisticated innovations—infinite scroll feeds, variable reward schedules, sophisticated targeting algorithms—are fundamentally incompatible with healthy child development.
As a single co-parenting father to Lucien (8) and Aurélien (3), this isn't theoretical. It's personal.
I see the magnetic pull of screens. I watch how quickly outdoor play gets abandoned for digital entertainment. I witness the subtle but profound changes in attention, creativity, and emotional regulation when screen time dominates.
Growing up in Sweden gave me a different reference point. Scandinavian culture has always embraced "lagom"—the idea that balance and moderation lead to well-being. Children are expected to spend significant time outdoors regardless of weather. There's a saying: "There's no bad weather, only bad clothes."
Swedish schools routinely take children into forests for "forest kindergarten" programs. Kids learn to light fires, use real tools, climb trees, and navigate natural risks under minimal adult supervision.
This isn't nostalgia for a simpler time. It's evidence that we can do better.
Here's what we're not seeing: the mental health problems that emerge from virtual worlds don't show up as broken bones or visible injuries. They manifest as anxiety, depression, attention disorders, and social dysfunction—problems that are harder to diagnose and infinitely harder to heal.
Physical injuries from outdoor play heal and build resilience. Psychological injuries from digital overexposure compound and create vulnerability.
A broken arm teaches a child about risk, recovery, and resilience. A broken algorithm teaches them about inadequacy, comparison, and addiction.
This isn't just about limiting devices. It's about actively creating alternatives that are more compelling than screens.
Real solutions require systemic change:
Neighborhood level: Create "play streets" where cars are restricted and children can safely explore. Establish community gardens, adventure playgrounds, and tool libraries where kids can build and create.
School level: Integrate outdoor education into core curriculum. Replace some standardized testing prep with forest schools, maker spaces with real tools, and structured recess with free-play time.
Family level: Model the behavior you want to see. Put your own device down. Plan adventures that require problem-solving, creativity, and physical engagement. Let your children be bored—boredom is the birthplace of creativity.
Policy level: Support legislation that treats social media companies like tobacco companies—requiring age verification, restricting addictive features, and holding platforms accountable for harm to minors.
Recent research in developmental neuroscience reveals why outdoor, unstructured play is irreplaceable for brain development.
When children engage in free-range play, they activate multiple neural networks simultaneously:
Screens, by contrast, typically engage only one or two neural pathways while suppressing others.
The developing brain literally requires the rich, multisensory, unpredictable stimulation that only real-world exploration provides.
As someone who helps organizations imagine and build better futures, I believe we need to radically reimagine what childhood looks like in our digital age.
The future of child development isn't about choosing between digital and analog. It's about age-appropriate integration.
Young children (ages 0-10) need predominantly analog experiences with minimal screen exposure. Their brains are building foundational neural pathways that require real-world sensory input.
Older children (ages 11-16) can gradually integrate digital tools—but for creation, not consumption. Coding, digital art, music production, and collaborative online learning serve development. Passive consumption and social media do not.
Technology should amplify human potential, not replace human experience.
Whether you're a parent, educator, employer, or community member, you have a role in addressing this crisis.
Start with yourself: Notice your own relationship with devices. Are you modeling the behavior you want to see? Are you present for the children in your life?
Question the narrative: When someone says "kids need to learn technology early to be prepared for the future," ask: "Prepared for what future? And at what cost?"
Support alternatives: Invest in outdoor education programs, nature-based learning, and community spaces that prioritize human-scale experiences over digital ones.
Advocate for change: Support legislation that protects children from exploitative digital platforms while preserving the genuine benefits of age-appropriate technology.
Here's my simple framework for evaluating childhood activities: Would I rather my child come home with a broken arm or a broken spirit?
Physical injuries (hopefully) heal and teach resilience. Psychological injuries from digital exposure create lasting vulnerability and dependence.
Every cast tells a story of adventure, learning, and growth. Every hour lost to algorithmic entertainment is a missed opportunity for real development.
This doesn't mean we should be reckless with children's safety. It means we should be thoughtful about what we're protecting them from and what we're protecting them toward.
This brings me to a personal question: What kind of childhood memories are we creating for this generation?
Will they remember the thrill of building tree forts and exploring creek beds? Or will they remember the anxiety of social media notifications and the emptiness of digital consumption?
More importantly: What are you doing to ensure the children in your life have access to real adventure, genuine risk, and authentic outdoor experiences?
Because here's what I've learned as both a futurist and a father: the most important technology for child development isn't digital at all. It's dirt, trees, rocks, and the irreplaceable classroom of the natural world.
What's breaking through on my radar:
Your turn: What childhood adventure shaped who you became? And how are you ensuring the next generation has access to similar formative experiences? Hit reply and share—because every child deserves stories worth telling.
Decoding Tomorrow explores the signals shaping our future. Each week, we separate lasting trends from temporary hype, helping you navigate change with clarity and confidence.
Sometimes the most important future we can build is one that remembers what childhood is supposed to look like.
PS. We create new, empowering stories for brands who are thinking deeply about their future and the kids/adolescents they represent and connect with. Recently we have been working with the board and executive leadership team of the Brisbane Broncos to re-imagine what the Broncos brand and organisation might look like in 2032 - both in the digital and analogue world. If you want to do something similar, reach out today.